Instagram Data Breach Reports Prove You Should Skip Facebook's Crypto (ccn.com)
Instagram Data Breach Reports Prove You Should Skip Facebook’s Crypto

Another day, another Facebook data leak affecting millions of dubious users. This time around, security researcher Anurag Sen discovered a public Amazon Web Services (AWS) database containing the contact information of more than 49 millionInstagram accounts, TechCrunch reports. For those out of the loop, Facebook is the monopolistic owner of Instagram and most other things social media.

DETAILS OF THE INSTAGRAM DATA LEAK


The exposed database includes public information from Instagram accounts such as the number of followers, likes, and shares of a particular user. More concerning, though, is the inclusion of email addresses and phone numbers of numerous account owners – information that Instagram allegedly keeps private.

Chtrbox, a social media marketing firm, owns the database. As part of the data, the company calculated a net worth for each account using public information and presumably reached out with offers through the suspiciously obtained contact information.Facebook has had little to say on the matter, telling TechCrunch:

“We’re looking into the issue to understand if the data described – including email and phone numbers – was from Instagram or from other sources.”

46 0 DAYS SINCE FACEBOOK’S LAST PRIVACY ACCIDENT


This latest Instagram snafu further proves that Facebook either doesn’t care or doesn’t know how to secure user privacy. Just last month, security firm UpGaurd revealed that you could find hundreds of millions of private Facebook user records through public third-party databases on Amazon. Sound familiar?

In the past five years, Facebook has leaked the private information of its users on several different occasions. August 2017 saw hackers obtain and sell email addresses and phone numbers of around 6 million Instagram users. In September 2018, Facebook security vulnerabilities enabled malicious parties to gather the personal information of almost 50 million users. And, who could forget the ridiculous Cambridge Analytica debacle?

Throw in Facebook’s risky, plaintext storage of passwords, and you paint a picture that’s drastically different than the company’s new “privacy-focused” brand.

YOU CAN’T TRUST FACEBOOK WITH ANYTHING, ESPECIALLY CRYPTOCURRENCY


Facebook’s crypto launch is right around the corner, but the recent data leak serves as a swift reminder to stay the hell away.Project Libra, the social media company’s secretive cryptocurrency project, has been in the works for more than a year. Initially, a payment system between Whatsapp users, the product has ballooned into a $1 billion conglomerate courting potential investments from payment processors like Visa and Mastercard.



placeHolder.png

But even big-name investments can’t help Facebook’s anti-privacy image. Since the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the company has seen a decline in job acceptance rates. Additionally, the social media platform’s user base is following a similar trend, losing 15 million users since 2017.


fb_usage_edison.jpg

Facebook usage continues to fall due to constant privacy blunders. | Source: Edison Research

Now more than ever, people care about the secrecy of their online personas. Although Facebook is starting to talk the privacy talk, it’s clear that the company isn’t prepared to walk the privacy walk.

Facebook’s cryptocurrency is already taboo because the company is completely centralized and even the hint of another security breach isn’t helping Mark Zuckerberg’s case.
    • 1
    Francisco Gimeno - BC Analyst We are not precisely defenders of FB here, but this article points could be said of many other private companies trying to launch a crypto. Hacking, hackers, backdoors, etc, are here to stay and try to get inside. The blockchain offers precisely a safer and more secure environment, as trust is at its core. The truth is that a future FB's crypto makes us unease due to FB's centralised business model, the opposite of a future digital tokenised 4th IR economy.